MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607376463 · doi:10.1071/rdv17n2ab265

265 SPERM DNA FRAGMENTATION AND PREGNANCY OUTCOME

2004· article· en· W1607376463 on OpenAlexfundno aff
D.P. Evenson

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSvenska Forskningsrådet FormasNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Agriculture, Forestry and FisheriesCanada Research ChairsSwedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education
KeywordsDNA fragmentationSpermAcridine orangeComet assayDNABiologyMolecular biologyPopulationAndrologyDNA damageChromatinSemenChemistryStainingGeneticsApoptosisProgrammed cell death

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sperm DNA integrity is obviously important for normal embryo development and pregnancy outcome. Over the past 25 years, various methods have been developed to measure sperm DNA strand breaks in situ. The Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA) treats sperm with low pH to denature DNA at the sites of DNA strand breaks, followed by acridine orange (AO) staining of green for native DNA and red for denatured DNA, as measured by flow cytometry (FCM), as well as % sperm with high DNA stainability (HDS: immature sperm with intact DNA related to decreased fertilization rates). FCM-sorted sperm from each SCSA-defined population (normal, moderate, and high DNA fragmentation and HDS sperm) show that the moderate DNA fragmentation index (DFI) population has the same image analysis characteristics as normal sperm without significant comets. Thus, an ICSI technician is not likely to differentiate between a normal and a moderate DFI sperm. The TUNEL assay uses an enzyme to add a fluorochrome-labeled base to a 3'-OH broken DNA strand. Both light microscopy and flow cytometry are used for measuring the % and extent of DNA fragmentation but cannot measure the level of HDS. For the COMET assay, sperm are suspended in an electrophoretic gel, placed on a glass microscope slide, digested with proteases and RNAse, subjected to an electric field, and then stained with a DNA dye. The % of comet positive sperm is scored, but the extent of fragmentation is difficult to define and the % HDS cannot be determined. Small pieces of fragmented DNA migrate in the gel forming a “comet.” All three methods have been used for both research and clinical diagnosis and as prognosis for livestock (bulls, boars, rams, stallions) and humans. Light microscope techniques suffer from a lack of statistical soundness needed for clinical decisions as well as present a potential bias in selection of sperm for measurements. Due to the thousands of sperm randomly selected for flow cytometry measurements, the data are statistically robust. Data from all three kinds of measurements in over a hundred manuscripts clearly show that sperm DNA fragmentation has a negative impact on embryo growth and pregnancy. Infertile animals may have nearly all of the sperm with fragmented DNA. Fertility ratings in bulls and boars are clearly related to the percent and extent of DNA fragmentation. Threshold levels for fertile/sub fertile/infertile differ for different species. Likewise different methods/laboratories have suggested various threshold levels to characterize a man with a highly fertile to low/very poor potential. The range of sperm with fragmented DNA is from ~2% to 100%. The SCSA method has defined a 27–30% DFI as the point in which a man is placed into a statistical category of taking a longer time to achieve in vivo pregnancy, more intrauterine insemination and routine IVF cycles, or no pregnancy. Current data suggest that ICSI may help overcome the diminished pregnancy prognosis with high DFI over the other ART or natural methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207