MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607383136

Employee forums in the UK: friend or foe of trade unions?

2008· article· en· W1607383136 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Michael Whittall, Alan Tuckman

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabor Movements and Unions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHans Böckler StiftungTrent UniversityNottingham Trent University
KeywordsPosition (finance)DirectiveTrade unionPublic relationsIndustrial relationsPolitical scienceInstitutionBusinessLawInternational tradeFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"With a tradition of informing and consulting employees resting on a single
\nunion channel, the 2002 EU Information and Consultation (ICE) Directive
\nwas bound to have a significant impact on employee relations in the UK
\nUndoubtedly, the works council as an institution, or employee forum as it
\nis often referred to in the UK, represents a totally new departure in UK
\nemployment relations. The article specifically focuses on the repercussions
\nemployee forums might have for trade unions. We focus on two
\ncompanies which have both recently founded employee forums to comply
\nwith ICE regulation. We ask whether such forums should be considered as
\nposing a threat to British trade unions, or platform for revitalising their
\nposition within the workplace." (author's abstract)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.007
Science and technology studies0.0350.016
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0130.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.159
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)Same topicLabor Movements and UnionsFrench-language works237,207