MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607393426 · doi:10.4000/books.pup.4223

Pilosité et horripilation dans les Problèmes d’Aristote d’Evrart de Conty

2004· book-chapter· fr· W1607393426 on OpenAlexaff
Bruno Roy

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Provence eBooks · 2004
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Philosophy and Thought
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanitiesPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’emploi du mot horripilation dans le contexte de la chevelure appelle un éclaircissement. L’horripilatio des Latins désignait le hérissement des poils; son entrée dans le vocabulaire français date, s’il faut en croire le Robert historique, de 1495. Cette date est celle de l’édition princeps de la Practique qui s’appelle Fleur de lys en medecine, traduction française du Lilium medicine de Bernard de Gordon. En toute logique, la véritable datation du mot devrait être celle de l’original frança...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Provence eBooksSame topicClassical Philosophy and ThoughtFrench-language works237,207