MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607407947 · doi:10.35499/tl.v8i01.813

Por um pensamento do signo fotográfico. A questão do objeto da imagem

2014· article· pt· W1607407947 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSemiotics and Representation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArtSemioticsEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Em que condições a fotografia pode adentrar no território da semiótica? Eis uma questão geral à qual este artigo tenta responder. O autor começa estabelecendo a diferença fundamental entre, de um lado, a noção de referência que pertence à linguística e à semiótica continental e, por outro lado, a noção de índice (index em inglês) que pertence à lógica pragmática de Peirce, ficando entendido que esta noção de índice é necessária ao fundamento da imagem fotográfica. Em seguida, o autor introduz o leitor à semiótica pragmática, empreendendo um paralelo entre a elaboração do pensamento do signo em Peirce e o desenvolvimento da fotografia. Na segunda parte do artigo, o autor procede a uma análise pragmática, centrada na ação do signo, de uma fotografia clássica de Dorothea Lange: Mãe Migrante. Esta análise permite firmar os principais avanços teóricos que figuram no texto como as noções de ícone e de semiosis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it