MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607444531 · doi:10.1016/j.crme.2009.12.006

Numerical model of a thermoacoustic engine

2010· article· en· W1607444531 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComptes Rendus Mécanique · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermoacoustic heat engineThermoacousticsMach numberHeat exchangerMechanicsHeat transferAcousticsBoundary value problemSound pressurePhysicsMathematicsThermodynamicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An asymptotically consistent small Mach number model of a standing wave thermoacoustic engine has been developed. A simple thermoacoustic engine consists of a resonating tube within which is inserted an acoustically compact assembly, composed of a stack of conducting plates, placed between two heat exchangers. The model couples one-dimensional linear acoustics in the resonator with a low Mach number viscous and conducting flow in the stack/heat exchangers section. The latter is solved through a two-dimensional numerical simulation. Results show that the model successfully captures the dynamics of the starting process, at a much lower cost than a fully compressible simulation of the entire engine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it