Format numérique ? Un portfolio étudiant pour la formation en ergothérapie*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Un portfolio professionnel étudiant est développé au Programme d’ergothérapie de l’Université d’Ottawa à la suite d’une réflexion sur l’obligation, pour les ergothérapeutes, d’utiliser un portfolio professionnel et sur la volonté de responsabiliser les étudiants face à leurs apprentissages. Nous avons mené une recherche-action pour concevoir le portfolio, faciliter son implantation et évaluer son utilisation en format numérique. Les résultats mettent en lumière la simplicité du contenu et de son organisation, une démarche d’utilisation guidée et un format numérique de niveau novice. Selon les auteurs, le portfolio professionnel étudiant est un outil d’apprentissage intéressant, mais un format numérique complexe risque d’entraver les apprentissages et la réflexion des étudiants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".