MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607548842 · doi:10.1002/pd.4023

Fetal neural tube defects in pregnant women previously submitted to bariatric surgery: more attention to a new emerging entity

2012· letter· en· W1607548842 on OpenAlexaff
Glória Pelizzo, Ghassan Nakib, Alessandro Alfei, Angela Iasci, Hellas Cena, Davide Locatelli, Mario Mosconi, F. Zappoli, Valeria Calcaterra

Bibliographic record

VenuePrenatal Diagnosis · 2012
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity Hospital Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeural tubeMedicineNeural tube defectMalnutritionPathogenesisFetusPregnancyRisk factorFetal surgerySurgeryObstetricsPathologyIn uteroBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

What's already known about this topic? The pathogenesis of neural tube defects is multifactorial. What does this study add? Although the pathogenesis of neural tube defects is certainly multifactorial, malnutrition after bariatric surgery has to be considered a major risk factor. Women who have undergone bariatric procedure must receive nutritional counselling before and after conception.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.297
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePrenatal DiagnosisSame topicBariatric Surgery and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207