MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607640118 · doi:10.1093/pch/12.9.777

Accelerated ventricular rhythm in healthy neonates

2007· article· en· W1607640118 on OpenAlexaff
Sachdeep Rehsia, Dion Pepelassis, Ilan Buffo-Sequeira

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Western OntarioLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRhythmSinus rhythmVentricular tachycardiaNormal Sinus RhythmCardiologyPediatricsInternal medicineAnesthesiaAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accelerated ventricular rhythm is similar in rate to the original sinus rhythm. Although 19 cases have been reported in healthy neonates without congenital disease, it is seen with some regularity at tertiary care paediatric cardiac centres. Accelerated ventricular rhythm carries good prognosis, but it is frequently misdiagnosed as ventricular tachycardia and is, thus, unnecessarily treated. The present report describes a case of a neonate who was not properly diagnosed after birth and who was inappropriately treated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score0.822

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersFrench-language works237,207