MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607663644 · doi:10.1002/0471643505.ch2

Probability and Random Processess Review

2004· other· en· W1607663644 on OpenAlexaff
J.F. Hayes, Thimma V. J. Ganesh Babu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Database Systems and Queries
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandom variableJoint probability distributionAlgebra of random variablesSum of normally distributed random variablesProbability-generating functionRandom functionProbability theoryRandom elementMathematicsProbability density functionRandom variateMoment-generating functionMarginal distributionProbability mass functionMultivariate random variableProbability distributionConditional probabilityIndependence (probability theory)Markov chainConvergence of random variablesStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The essentials of probability and random processes required in the text are outlined. In this chapter as well as in succeeding chapters, numerical results illustrate the theoretical results. These results are obtained using three different tools as appropriate to the work at hand: Excel, Matlab and Maple. Starting with set theory, and the axioms of probability we derive basic relations, and the concepts of conditional probabilities and independence. The next section deals with random variables and their distribution and density functions. The discussion is in two parts dealing with discrete and continuous random variables, respectively and covers all of the widely used random variables. The probability generating function for discrete random variables and the Laplace transform for continuous random variables receive particular attention because of their role in the text. In subsequent sections, the discussion of basic probability theory is completed with discussions of joint random variables, transformations of random variables and bounds on probabilistic events. The final half of the chapter deals with the fundamentals of Markov chains and of random processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Database Systems and QueriesFrench-language works237,207