MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607666138 · doi:10.7202/032532ar

Le Pergélisol et les processus Thermokarstiques de la région de la rivière Nastapoca, Nouveau-Québec

2007· article· fr· W1607666138 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Maurice K. Séguin, Michel Allard

Bibliographic record

VenueGéographie physique et Quaternaire · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'embouchure de la rivière Nastapoca, sur la côte est de la mer d'Hudson, est située dans la zone de pergélisol discontinu, en domaine de toundra arbustive. La morphologie cryogène y varie selon les types de dépôts quaternaires dans lesquels le pergélisol s'est installé. Les limons argileux de la mer de Tyrrell se caractérisent par des champs de buttes cryogènes entrecoupées de mares de thermokarst et de vallons dissymétriques. Parsemé d'ostioles et animé de mouvements de solifluxion et de glissements superficiels, le mollisol évolue de façon très dynamique. La densité croissante des lacs thermokarstiques et une taille décroissante des buttes cryogènes du littoral vers l'intérieur des terres illustrent un gradient régional de dégradation du pergélisol. Les sables fluviomarins et littoraux pergélisolés constituent aussi des buttes cryogènes, mais sans sols figurés. Quant aux drumlins et autres dépôts de moraine de fond, ils sont affectés par un réseau de polygones à coins sableux. L'épaisseur moyenne du pergélisol dans les dépôts, mesurée par des sondages de résis-tivité électrique, est de l'ordre de 20 m. La nivation, la solifluxion, les glissements de terrain et l'effet thermique des mares sont les agents d'une dégradation généralisée du pergélisol dans la région.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéographie physique et QuaternaireSame topicLandslides and related hazardsFrench-language works237,207