MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1607738323 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v61i5.80

Dedicated Fax Machine to Increase Scrutiny of Medication Orders for Pediatric Hospital Inpatients

2008· article· en· W1607738323 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Brandi Newby

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPatient Safety and Medication Errors
Canadian institutionsSurrey Memorial Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineScrutinyPediatric hospitalPediatricsHumanitiesPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background: Some children are treated at hospitals that focus on adult care. When orders for children and adults are interspersed, it can be difficult to recognize the pediatric orders. As a result, pediatric patients are at greater risk of medication dosing errors. Pharmacists need to be able to immediately recognize pediatric orders and perform appropriate dose checks. Objective: To determine if a dedicated fax machine for pediatric orders would lead to increased scrutiny of such orders by pharmacists. Methods: Review and analysis of pediatric orders processed before and after installation of a dedicated fax machine for pediatric orders at a community hospital. Results: The proportion of pediatric orders with appropriate dose-checking increased from 47.9% (57/119) before to 64.1% (109/170) after installation of the dedicated fax machine. For patients up to 12 years of age, appropriate dose-checking increased from 49.6% (56/113) to 74.5% (105/141). Conclusions : Pharmacists’ scrutiny of pediatric orders increased after installation of a dedicated fax machine for pediatric orders. RESUME Contexte : Certains enfants sont traites dans des hopitaux specialises dans les soins aux adultes. Lorsque les ordonnances pour enfants sont intercalees entre celles pour adultes, il peut etre difficile de les reconnaitre. Il en resulte donc un risque accru d’erreurs de posologie pour les enfants. Les pharmaciens doivent etre en mesure de reconnaitre immediatement les ordonnances pour enfants et d’effectuer une verification congruente des posologies. Objectif : Determiner si l’emploi d’un telecopieur reserve a la reception des ordonnances pour enfants entrainerait leur examen plus minutieux par les pharmaciens. Methode : Un examen des ordonnances pour enfants executees avant et apres l’installation d’un telecopieur reserve a la reception de celles-ci a ete effectue dans un hopital communautaire. Resultats : La proportion d’ordonnances pour enfants ayant fait l’objet d’une verification posologique congruente a augmente, passant de 47,9 % (57/119) avant l’installation du telecopieur reserve a la reception des ordonnances pour enfants, a 64,1 % (109/170) apres son installation. Chez les patients âges de 12 ans ou moins, la verification posologique congruente a augmente de 49,6 % (56/113) a 74,5 % (105/141). Conclusions : L’installation d’un telecopieur reserve a la reception des ordonnances pour enfants a entraine leur examen plus minutieux par les pharmaciens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy→Same topicPatient Safety and Medication Errors→French-language works237,207→