MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607814349

Lenin's Terror: The Ideological Origins of Early Soviet State Violence

2013· article· en· W1607814349 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bárbara Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAnarchism and Radical Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyState (computer science)Context (archaeology)Power (physics)LawSpanish Civil WarSociologyMarxist philosophyHistoryPoliticsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

James Ryan. Lenin's Terror: The Ideological Origins of Early Soviet State Violence. London and New York: Routledge, 2012. xvii, 260 pp. Bibliography. Index. Endnotes. $155.00, cloth.In his revised doctoral dissertation, James Ryan examines Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin's ideas and directives on violence, its role in Marxist philosophy, its use as a revolutionary tactic, and distinctions Lenin found between terror and revolutionary violence more broadly. Ryan has carefully analyzed Lenin's published writings and thoroughly mined a broad range of relevant Anglo-American secondary literature as well as Russian-language scholarly work on topic.Studying Lenin's thought on violence from 1890s to 1923, Ryan concentrates on years when Bolsheviks were in power. Of eight chapters, two discuss Lenin's thought up to 1917, one is devoted to revolutionary year 1917, five cover Civil War, and one transition to early years of New Economic Policy. The chronological approach allows Ryan to trace change and continuity in Lenin's thought over time.Neither an apologist for Lenin nor one prone to ad hominem attacks on Leninist approaches, Ryan succeeds in carefully situating Lenin's ideological pronouncements, his policies, and directives in context of important events in Russian and European history. Moreover, he understands that Bolshevism accommodated leaders with views that departed from those of Lenin, that Lenin's ideas often did not prevail, and that lower-level officials did not consistently implement Lenin's instructions or orders. Nevertheless, Lenin's ideas on violence are important to study separately, for he was the leading and most influential figure (p. 1) in party and Soviet government.Ryan situates his analysis firmly in middle of those who take very divergent approaches toward analyzing Lenin's personality and ideas, and toward role of ideology or contingency in creation of Soviet regime. He believes that ideology alone did not determine Bolshevik policies, but that it influenced strongly how Lenin and other Bolsheviks reacted to circumstances; moreover, they often created hostile circumstances (p. 8) because of their ideological convictions. Nevertheless, Lenin and other Bolshevik leaders applied violent methods not from a love of force, but because they judged them necessary in order to overcome violent opposition of bourgeoisie. They also accepted and used other methods, including propaganda and non-violent pressure.An excellent introduction clearly lays out author's intentions, and each chapter develops his analysis with little resort to jargon. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.804
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Slavonic PapersSame topicAnarchism and Radical PoliticsFrench-language works237,207