MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Conditional variance estimation in regression models with long memory

2012· article· en· W1607846922 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Time Series Analysis · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRobert Bosch Stiftung
KeywordsMathematicsEstimatorHeteroscedasticityKernel regressionConditional varianceEconometricsParametric statisticsKernel (algebra)Applied mathematicsOracleStatisticsEquivalence (formal languages)Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticityComputer scienceDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article we study asymptotic properties of a non‐parametric kernel estimator of the conditional variance in a random design model with parametric mean and heteroscedastic errors, for a class of long‐memory errors and predictors. We establish small and large bandwidths asymptotics, which show a different behaviour compared with that of kernel estimators of the conditional mean. We distinguish between an oracle case (i.e. where the errors are directly observed) and a non‐oracle case (where the errors are replaced with residuals) and show non‐equivalence between the oracle and non‐oracle case. We also discuss a practical problem of bandwidth choice. Theoretical results are justified by simulation studies. We apply our theory to DJA and FTSE indices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.387
Threshold uncertainty score0.806

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it