MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607916241 · doi:10.25100/cdea.v22i35.233

Envejecimiento del personal

2011· article· es· W1607916241 on OpenAlexaff
Sergio Castrillon

Bibliographic record

VenueCuadernos de Administración · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRetirement, Disability, and Employment
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

¿De que manera la literatura en ciencias administrativas ha abordado el estudio del envejecimiento del personal? ¿Cuáles son las razones que han motivado este interés en los últimos años? Cuáles son las lógicas subyacentes? Reconociendo las tendencias demográficas mundiales que reflejan el envejecimiento de la población; este artículo procura responder a esta preguntas, a partir de una revisión exhaustiva de las principales publicaciones que se han ocupado del tema en el contexto internacional. Nuestro propósito es aumentar la visibilidad de la problemática y contribuir al debate sugiriendo acciones que revaloricen su dimensión humana

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.266
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCuadernos de AdministraciónSame topicRetirement, Disability, and EmploymentFrench-language works237,207