MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607935786 · doi:10.29173/mruhr106

German Atrocities Against Allied Prisoners of War in the First World War

2014· article· en· W1607935786 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Michelle Gomke

Bibliographic record

VenueMount Royal Undergraduate Humanities Review (MRUHR) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
Canadian institutionsMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrisoners of warGermanWar crimeWorld War IILawPolitical scienceConventionSpanish Civil WarCaptivityCriminologyTortureHistorySociologyHuman rightsInternational lawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The German atrocities towards Allied prisoners of war during the First World War is a topic that is widely over-looked. Millions of Allied POWs were taken prisoner and held captive by the Germans. At the hands of their captors, the Allied POWs suffered brutal atrocities in the form of violence and inhumane conditions. Through ignoring the Hague Convention's laws of war to the many months or even years spent in POW camps in Germany to the impact of the period of captivity, the Allied POWs endured atrocities commited by the Germans. In examining the many ways the Allies suffered, the atrocities are now being brought to light.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMount Royal Undergraduate Humanities Review (MRUHR)Same topicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and ImpactFrench-language works237,207