MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607945875 · doi:10.1109/isscs.2015.7203939

Primary user activity prediction using the hidden Markov model in cognitive radio networks

2015· article· en· W1607945875 on OpenAlexaff
Ramiyar Heydari, Shahpour Alirezaee, Arash Ahmadi, Majid Ahmadi, Iman Mohammadsharifi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive radioHidden Markov modelComputer scienceFrame (networking)Channel (broadcasting)Airfield traffic patternMarkov modelMarkov processSpectrum (functional analysis)Markov chainComputer networkMachine learningArtificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionWirelessTelecommunicationsStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cognitive radio (CR) is a system for sense and access of spectrum opportunistically. It is designed on spectrum holes in primary users (PU) over licensed frequency bands. Determining access time for the secondary user (SU) is one of the most important issues in cognitive radio systems. This spectrum availability can be optimized by applying learning methods. In this paper, the hidden Markov model (HMM) is applied to determine and predict channel activity patterns. Specifically, a sensing frame structure is proposed to learn the channel activity pattern and apply the patterns as training vectors; afterward, the HMM model is modified for predicting the channel usage activity by PU. Three traffic patterns are considered as Heavy Traffic, Balanced Traffic and Slow Traffic. The results indicate 72% validity in Balanced Traffic while unbalanced traffic decreases prediction validity to 56%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207