ODP Site 1224: A missing link in the investigation of seafloor weathering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A section of Eocene (46 Ma) upper oceanic crust was recovered at Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Site 1224 in the northeast Pacific basin. The secondary mineralogy and geochemistry of altered basalts and isotopic composition of Ca‐carbonate were studied to determine the extent and nature of alteration at this site. Most basalts are <5% altered to secondary mineral assemblages of Fe‐oxyhydroxides, celadonite, saponite, Ca‐carbonate, trace pyrite, and rare phillipsite and quartz. Alteration is concentrated within brown and dark gray haloes, which formed adjacent to veins and fractures. Haloes comprise 10% of the core (9% dark gray; 1% brown); veins comprise <1% of the core, with an average of 18 veins per meter of recovered cores. Calculated chemical fluxes, which account for groundmass alteration and the composition and abundance of secondary minerals associated with veins, vesicles, and haloes, indicate significant additions of Si, FeT, Mg, Ca, and CO2 and minor additions of Al, Mn, and Na to the crust. The magnitude of these fluxes is low relative to other drilled volcanic sections such as Sites 504, 896, 417, and 418. 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.70776 to 0.70824) and trace element ratios (Mg/Ca) of calcite imply that Ca‐carbonate formed within 20 Ma of crustal formation from relatively unaltered seawater. Oxygen isotope data yield Ca‐carbonate formation temperatures of 4 to 11°C. The relative freshness of the Site 1224 lavas is attributed to the capping of the volcanic section by massive flows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".