MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1608139045 · doi:10.7202/1064434ar

Remarques sur l’essence réaliste-politique du cinéma

2008· article· fr· W1608139045 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emmanuel Barot

Bibliographic record

VenueSens public · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMovie theaterArtHumanitiesArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le film politique n’est pas un genre authentifiable immédiatement : distinguer entre cinéma civique et pédagogique, cinéma militant et cinéma de propagande permet d’y voir plus clair. Mais au-delà, la vocation réaliste au sens large du cinéma politique impose une conceptualisation plus aboutie. Sa politicité intrinsèque tient à ce qu’il est totalisation, c'est-à-dire production dialectique d’un signifiant universel, à l’occasion d’un singulier représenté, faisant résonner la tension « du » réel, qui ne se réduit pas à une collection de faits, en le hantant de ses ambiguïtés et de ses possibles, donc en le défatalisant. Ce qui affirme sa vocation libératrice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.021
Scholarly communication0.0120.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSens publicSame topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207