Analysis of the spatial resolution of body-surface dominant-frequency mapping systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study we assess the ability of high-density body-surface lead systems to resolve local dominant-frequency (DF) values. In a detailed numerical model of the human thorax, we calculate the measurement sensitivity distribution (MSD) of the 117 unipolar leads of a Dalhousie lead system. Based on the MSD, we compute the lead equivalent volume (LEV) of each unipolar lead and use it to quantify the lead spatial resolution (SR). Anterior leads positioned in columns 4–6 and rows 3–5 of the Dalhousie system have the lowest LEV values (2.4% 11%). Optimal lead positioning can increase the resolution of local DF values. However, the ability to resolve local DF values in selected regions is limited by the intrinsic MSD of body-surface leads. Our results indicate that further signal processing stages are needed to improve the SR of body-surface DF maps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it