MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1608246717 · doi:10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.wmp30

Abstract W MP30: Safety of Unfractionated Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

2014· article· en· W1608246717 on OpenAlexaff
Airton Leonardo de Oliveira Manoel, Alberto Goffi, David Turkel‐Parrella, Victoria McCredie, David Ben‐Israel, Simon Abrahamson

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAneurysmSubarachnoid hemorrhageHeparinPulmonary embolismSurgeryPopulationAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) is common in patients admitted to intensive care units. The incidence of VTE in patients suffering from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) varies from 1.5 to 18%, depending on the series and the screening strategy. There is limited data addressing the role of chemical prophylaxis in the aSAH population. Our institutional guidelines suggest VTE prophylaxis with sequential compression pneumatic devices prior to securing a ruptured intracranial aneurysm. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) at a dose of 5,000 IU (SC every 12 h) is considered after the aneurysm has been secured for 24 hours. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from all aSAH patients admitted to a 19-bed high volume aSAH ICU, between January 2013 and June 2013. Results: Fifty-two patients with aSAH (mean age 58.6, range 28-93) were admitted during the study period. In total, 61 aneurysms were found, 46 ruptured, and additional 10 incidentally discovered aneurysm. 72.1% of aSAH patients received UFH after aneurysm treatment. In the 26.9% of patients UFH was withheld; these patients had either unsecured aneurysms or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments. Of the patients who received UFH 48.7% received the medication at 24h after aneurysm treatment, 33.5% within 72h; and in 15.4% heparin was started beyond 72h after aneurysm treatment. The mean time from aneurysm treatment to initiation of VTE prophylaxis was 2.1 days. Of those patients who received UFH, 22 patients (58%) had an External Ventricular Drain. Endovascular treatment was the main modality as compared to surgical clipping (61.5 vs 15.4%). 6 patients (11.5%) received prophylactic dose of UFH and dual antiplatelets therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel). 1 patient (2%) who was on UFH had a major cerebral hemorrhagic complication and died, however, this patient was also on aspirin and clopidogrel. 8 patients (21%) were investigated for clinical suspicion of VTE; 1 patient (2%) on UFH had a pulmonary embolism. Conclusion: The use of subcutaneous UFH for VTE prophylaxis after 24h of aneurysm treatment is feasible, safe, and effective in an aSAH population. Caution should be taken in patients receiving subcutaneous UFH and antiplatelet agents, in whom the risk of intra-cerebral bleeding is higher.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→French-language works237,207→