Bibliographic record
Abstract
¿De qué modo cambian los significados de un local de hip hop durante la trayectoria de un rapero aspirante? Este artículo utiliza cuatro años de trabajo de campo etnográfico continuado con varones de barrios marginados de la ciudad que rapean en el Project Blowed, un evento de ‘open mic’ de hip hop en la zona South Central de Los Ángeles. Aunque los raperos en un principio consideran al Project Blowed como un lugar en donde perfeccionar sus habilidades interpretativas y ganarse el respeto de sus pares, esperan poder dejarlo atrás y hacer dinero en la industria de la música. Los OGs, raperos mayores con experiencia, que siguen participando en esta escena actúan como mentores de los raperos más jóvenes, pero también pueden convertirse en ejemplos de las trayectorias estancas que los raperos emergentes quieren evitar. Este artículo explora cómo el modo en que los participantes perciben este local está vinculado a sus percepciones cambiantes de otros individuos de la escena.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".