MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1608478497 · doi:10.1080/21693277.2014.913125

A joint economic lot size model with price and environmentally sensitive demand

2014· article· en· W1608478497 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProduction & Manufacturing Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVendorProfit (economics)Supply chainProduction (economics)Product (mathematics)Quality (philosophy)EconomicsSupply and demandMicroeconomicsInvestment (military)Industrial organizationBusinessMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a joint economic lot size (JELS) model for coordinated inventory replenishment decisions considering price and environmentally sensitive demand. It assumes a single product that flows along a two-level supply chain (vendor–buyer). The buyer's demand is linear and sensitive to the product's price and its environmental performance. A capital investment is considered necessary to improve the production process resulting in an indirect improvement of the product's environmental quality. A mathematical model is developed to represent this situation and solved to maximize the total profit of the supply chain for: (1) the vendor's production lot size quantity and the number of shipments to the buyer, and (2) the selling price and the amount invested to improve the production process. Numerical examples are provided with their results discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it