Bibliographic record
Abstract
Writing about the self and writings about notable figures have long been the focus of life writings. Donald Winslow, for example, provides this definition of the term “life-writing”: “In the narrower sense this term means biography, but in general it may include autobiography as well, so that it is actually a more inclusive term than biography , even though some people may consider the word biography to include autobiographical works, letters, diaries, and the like. Life-writing has been used since the eighteenth century, although it has never been as widely current as biography and autobiography since these words came into the language.” When applied to transatlantic literary studies from 1680 to 1830, in particular, the term also includes the personal narrative, such as the spiritual, captivity, slave, and travel narrative, and works as disparate as Mary Rowlandson's captivity narrative The Soveraignty and Goodness of God (1682), Samuel Sewall's Diary (1674–1729), Cotton Mather's Diary (1681–1724), Sarah Kemble Knight's Journal (1704), William Byrd's Diaries (1709–41), Lady Mary Wortley Montagu's Letters (1709–62), Jonathan Edwards's Personal Narrative (c. 1740), Elizabeth Ashbridge's Account (1755), Samson Occom's “A Short Narrative of My Life” (1768), John Woolman's Journal (1774), Andrew Burnaby's Travels…1759 and 1760 (1775), Elizabeth House Trist's Travel Diary (1784--5), Samuel Johnson's Letters (1731–84), Olaudah Equiano's Interesting Narrative (1789), and Benjamin Franklin's Autobiography (1791). Life writings convey news, record observations, or relay experience, and may be addressed to a single recipient or to a larger, more public audience. Whether in manuscript or print, they have a unique eyewitness quality that differs from an official report or a historical overview. As the writer retells a life's event or relates a story, there is a compelling sense of learning about the past as it unfolds in real time. Life writings thus document individual responses to a contemporary world. Family members send news of births, marriages, and deaths, along with updates on health, crops, and activities, which collectively preserve family histories. Spiritual aspirants recount emotional struggles towards conversion. Travelers describe roads, accommodations, and towns, which then aids other travelers. Captives tell of their strategies for survival. Slaves testify to the indignities of slavery and inspire a movement towards abolition. Whether from the actual sharing of life writings across the Atlantic (as with a letter or a travel account) or from their content (as in a diary, autobiography, or personal narrative), life writings clearly enhance transatlantic literary studies. This chapter will discuss the ways in which life writings were read and used, describe the influence of technology on distribution, draw attention to the existence and role of manuscript publication, and, overall, demonstrate the impact of life writings in the Atlantic world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.216 | 0.113 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".