Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Writing about the self and writings about notable figures have long been the focus of life writings. Donald Winslow, for example, provides this definition of the term "life-writing": "In the narrower sense this term means biography, but in general it may include autobiography as well, so that it is actually a more inclusive term than biography, even though some people may consider the word biography to include autobiographical works, letters, diaries, and the like. Life-writing has been used since the eighteenth century, although it has never been as widely current as biography and autobiography since these words came into the language." When applied to transatlantic literary studies from 1680 to 1830, in particular, the term also includes the personal narrative, such as the spiritual, captivity, slave, and travel narrative, and works as disparate as Mary Rowlandson's captivity narrative The Soveraignty and Goodness of God (1682), Samuel Sewall's Diary (1674–1729), Cotton Mather's Diary (1681–1724), Sarah Kemble Knight's Journal (1704), William Byrd's Diaries (1709–41), Lady Mary Wortley Montagu's Letters (1709–62), Jonathan Edwards's Personal Narrative (c. 1740), Elizabeth Ashbridge's Account (1755), Samson Occom's "A Short Narrative of My Life" (1768), John Woolman's Journal (1774), Andrew Burnaby's Travels…1759 and 1760 (1775), Elizabeth House Trist's Travel Diary (1784--5), Samuel Johnson's Letters (1731–84), Olaudah Equiano's Interesting Narrative (1789), and Benjamin Franklin's Autobiography (1791).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it