MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1608770480 · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2005.1571406

A Driver Fatigue Recognition Model Using Fusion of Multiple Features

2006· article· en· W1608770480 on OpenAlexafffund
Genyuan Yang, Yun Lin, Paritosh Bhattacharya

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceSet (abstract data type)HeuristicArtificial intelligenceDempster–Shafer theoryKey (lock)FusionMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By using the fusion of contextual, visual and non-visual features, a model based on Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory is proposed to obtain a reliable driver's fatigue recognition. Firstly, an overall model structure is set up with respect to the selected features and key symptoms of driver's fatigue. Secondly, a set of heuristic knowledge rules are used to determine the basic probability assignment; and a modified evidence combination is adopted to combine multiple pieces of evidence including consistent and conflicting ones. Thirdly, decision policy based on the basic probability assignment is applied to fatigue recognition. At last, an example is given to illustrate the proposed fatigue recognition model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score0.862

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSleep and Work-Related FatigueFrench-language works237,207