Kritisches Erbe: Nationalsozialismus, Recht und Erinnerung (Critical Inheritance: National Socialism, Law and Memory)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Die Einfuehrung in den Schwerpunkt Kritisches Erbe -- Nationalsozialismus, Recht und Erinnerung in der KJ 3/2013 bietet einen Ueberblick ueber die Auseinandersetzung von Jurist/innen der BRD mit der NS-Vergangenheit und hebt die Rolle der KJ als Forum fuer Diskussionen hervor. Der Beitrag stellt neuere Perspektiven und interdisziplinaere Forschungsansaetze vor und kontextualisiert die Artikel dieses Schwerpunktheftes. This editorial presents the special section Critical Inheritance: National Socialism, Law and Memory in the journal Kritische Justiz. The co-editors Lena Foljanty and Christiane Wilke briefly survey the history of the engagement of the German legal profession with its history, recognize the important role of the journal Kritische Justiz in this process, and proceed to discuss more recent (and more interdisciplinary) approaches to the question about the legacy of National Socialism in German law and the legal profession.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".