Increased lipid oxidation during exercise in obese pubertal girls: A QUALITY study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study explores differences in LO rates between pre-pubertal and pubertal girls of three body weight status groups. METHODS: The sample included 39 pre-pubertal girls [12 normal-weight (NW), 12 overweight (OW), and 15 obese (OB)] and 37 pubertal girls [16 NW, 10 OW, and 11 OB]. Following a rest period, the girls performed a graded maximal cycling test. The %LO contribution was computed at each stage. RESULTS: The %LO contribution did not differ between NW, OW, or OB pre-pubertal girls at each exercise stage. In contrast, pubertal OB girls showed a statistically significantly higher %LO contribution at 25, 50, and 75 W stages compared with OW and NW as well as with OB pre-pubertal girls. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that entering puberty is a period associated with differentiation in substrate selection in obese girls. A higher %LO contribution may help girls to solicit more fat while performing submaximal exercise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".