MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1609219727

Microbially controlled selenate reduction in nutrient limited systems.

2005· article· en· W1609219727 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul A. Kenward

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSelenium in Biological Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReduction (mathematics)NutrientEnvironmental scienceSelenateChemistryBiologyEcologyMathematicsSelenium
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global cycling of toxic metals is of great concern to people world wide. Understanding the factors, biotic and abiotic, controlling metal mobility and persistence in natural aquatic environments has been the topics of many studies in recent decades. One of the toxic metals whose mobility and toxicity is of great concern is selenium. Selenium poisoning in fish and aquatic birds can cause terratogenic mutations and increased mortality in contaminated systems. Selenium mobility, and therefore bioavailability is dominated by its oxidation state. The selenium oxyanions selenate and selenite are far more mobile than elemental selenium. Elemental selenium precipitates and binds out of aquatic systems. As such, the goal of many modern remediation strategies has been to reduce selenate and selenite to elemental selenium. Bacteria have been explored as potential natural remediators of selenium and other toxic ions in natural systems. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) Paper copy at Leddy Library: Theses & Major Papers - Basement, West Bldg. / Call Number: Thesis2005 .K43. Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 44-03, page: 1307. Thesis (M.Sc.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 2005.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)Same topicSelenium in Biological SystemsFrench-language works237,207