MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1609313883 · doi:10.1063/1.3215847

4-micron Direct Imaging Searches for Planets Around ε Eri and ε Ind

2009· article· en· W1609313883 on OpenAlexaff
M. Janson, Tomonori Usuda, Motohide Tamura, Miki Ishii

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlanetDirect imagingRadial velocityExoplanetPhysicsPlanetary systemStarsSolar SystemBrown dwarfAstrophysicsAstronomyPlanetary massOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At distances of only 3.3 and 3.6 pc respectively, ε Eri and ε Ind are two of the closest solar‐type stars. In addition, they both exhibit long‐term radial velocity (RV) trends indicative of planetary companions at relatively large separations, making them interesting for the purpose of direct imaging. Previously, we have reported the results of a deep imaging campaign of ε Eri at 4 microns, which, in combination with dynamical data, led to the exclusion of any planets more massive than 3 Mjup anywhere in the system. Here, we will briefly review those results, as well as the results using the same method for ε Ind A, where the massive planet or low‐mass brown dwarf implied by the RV trend was undetected, and similar constraints could be determined on the system parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207