MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1610632160 · doi:10.21423/aabppro20044889

Chronic Wasting Disease and Animal Agriculture

2004· article· en· W1610632160 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elizabeth S. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPrion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of WyomingU.S. Department of DefenseNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsChronic wasting diseaseOdocoileusLivestockGeographyBiologyVeterinary medicineEcologyDiseaseMedicinePrion proteinScrapie

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic wasting disease (CWD), a member of the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), is only known to naturally affect mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), white-tailed deer (O. uirginianus), and Rocky Mountain elk (Ceruus elaphus nelsoni). It has been recognized in an endemic focus along the front range of the Rocky Mountains in northern Colorado and in the hills of southeastern Wyoming for more than 30 years. Since 1996, CWD has been identified in free-ranging and farmed cervids in 15 western and midwestern states and Canadian provinces and elk imported to Korea from Canada. Surveillance for a TSE in cattle sympatric with deer and elk with CWD began in the early 1990s and has been ongoing since then. Experiments to determine host range of CWD in livestock began in the 1980s. Since that time cattle, domestic sheep and domestic goats have been exposed to the CWD agent by various means. All of these species are susceptible to CWD by intracerebral inoculation but, to date, CWD has not been found to affect traditional domestic livestock species when exposed by natural routes. Chronic wasting disease is of concern in farmed elk and white-tailed deer. Control of this disease in the cervid industries is based in state, provincial, and federal regulations. Surveillance of domestic livestock for TSEs in parallel with surveillance for CWD in farmed and free-ranging cervids will need to be continued into the foreseeable future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference ProceedingsSame topicPrion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingFrench-language works237,207