MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1610658531

Two-Way Slab Parking Structures in Canada

2013· article· en· W1610658531 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hassan Aoude, William D. Cook, Denis Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueACI Concrete International · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Corrosion and Durability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforced concreteSlabStructural engineeringForensic engineeringEngineeringCivil engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reinforced concrete parking structures in parts of Canada require special attention in terms of design, construction, and maintenance due to the use of chlorides in deicing chemicals. The cold climate requires the use of deicing chemicals, but chlorides may have a harmful effect on reinforced concrete. Older reinforced concrete parking structures were not properly designed for such conditions and show deterioration after only a few years. Many structures are liable to progressive collapse after a punching shear failure. This article reviews factors that can affect the structural safety of two-way slab parking structures in Canada, looking at the inadequacy of older design codes, construction defects, design errors, deterioration, and overloading.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACI Concrete InternationalSame topicConcrete Corrosion and DurabilityFrench-language works237,207