MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1610953312 · doi:10.3917/sc.017.0041

La mécanique de la dictature

2014· article· fr· W1610953312 on OpenAlexaff
Régis Michel

Bibliographic record

VenueSavoirs et clinique · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCritical Theory and Political Philosophy
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyArtPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rares sont les interviews de Lucrecia Martel, et cet entretien public est assurément l’un des plus personnels. On y lira (entre autres) d’importants développements sur ses projets en cours, sur sa vision critique de la société argentine, avec sa bourgeoisie provinciale aux traditions religieuses sinon monstrueuses, sur la nature incestueuse des relations familiales, le message politique de ses films, l’importance qu’elle attache à l’écriture du scénario, sa pratique du casting ou de la direction d’acteurs, et même des anecdotes hautement symboliques sur sa vie privée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSavoirs et cliniqueSame topicCritical Theory and Political PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207