MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1610960555 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1995.526672

Extraction of characteristics from an image by analysis with multiple spatial resolutions

2002· article· en· W1610960555 on OpenAlexaff
M. Mkaouar, Richard Lepage

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSketchArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceComputer visionPyramid (geometry)Pattern recognition (psychology)Vigilance (psychology)Feature extractionDetectorGaussianMathematicsAlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By analogy to the mammalian visual system, a scheme is presented for image characteristic extraction from several channels of analysis with spatial frequencies. The significant contours on several scales are integrated to form a connected sketch. Frequency bands are generated by the bias of a Gaussian filter to obtain a multiresolution pyramid. A top-down analysis is adopted to generate the final sketch. After choice of the vigilance index (number of layers of the pyramid used for analysis), information from a higher level is used to check the processing at the underlying level. The vigilance index controls the nature of information to be extracted. Integration of this contour detector into a system of automatic inspection of printed circuit boards shows that a small vigilance index makes it possible to verify the state of components, their identification and connection, whereas a large index leads to a sketch suitable for recognition of the components and verification of their correct positioning on the board.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionFrench-language works237,207