MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1611016675 · doi:10.1116/1.1651546

Single crystal growth of Ge1−xSix alloys using the traveling solvent method

2004· article· en· W1611016675 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor materials and interfaces
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsElectron microprobeMicroprobeComposition (language)Materials scienceSolventAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Crystal (programming language)ConductivitySeedingCrystal growthSingle crystalHall effectTransverse planeElectrical resistivity and conductivityCrystallographyCondensed matter physicsChemistryMineralogyThermodynamicsMetallurgyPhysicsChromatographyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single crystal growth of Ge1−xSix alloys with Si composition ranging from 2 to 15 at. %. using the traveling solvent method (TSM) is presented. The growths were carried out using Ge 〈111〉 seeds or a self-seeding method. Electron microprobe, Laue x-ray, and Hall effect techniques were used to characterize the quality of the materials. The standard deviations associated with the composition profiles along and transverse to the growth direction were less than 0.4 and 0.3 at. %, respectively. A change in conductivity from n to p type in the TSM samples was observed at a Si composition <5 at. %.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it