Quantized Stationary Control Policies in Markov Decision Processes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For a large class of Markov Decision Processes, stationary (possibly randomized) policies are globally optimal. However, in Borel state and action spaces, the computation and implementation of even such stationary policies are known to be prohibitive. In addition, networked control applications require remote controllers to transmit action commands to an actuator with low information rate. These two problems motivate the study of approximating optimal policies by quantized (discretized) policies. To this end, we introduce deterministic stationary quantizer policies and show that such policies can approximate optimal deterministic stationary policies with arbitrary precision under mild technical conditions, thus demonstrating that one can search for $\varepsilon$-optimal policies within the class of quantized control policies. We also derive explicit bounds on the approximation error in terms of the rate of the approximating quantizers. We extend all these approximation results to randomized policies. These findings pave the way toward applications in optimal design of networked control systems where controller actions need to be quantized, as well as for new computational methods for generating approximately optimal decision policies in general (Polish) state and action spaces for both discounted cost and average cost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it