MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1611181998 · doi:10.3233/wor-131745

Work transition tips: Inclusion for workers with hearing loss: Actions for work practice professionals

2013· article· en· W1611181998 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lynn Shaw, Madeleine Jennings, Sophia E. Kramer

Bibliographic record

VenueWork · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFacilities and Workplace Management
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Inclusion (mineral)Transition (genetics)Hearing lossPsychologyAudiologyMedical educationBusinessMedicineSocial psychologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L. Shawa, M.B. Jenningsb and S.E. Kramerc,d School of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada National Centre of Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada VU University Medical Center, Department of ENT/Audiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorkSame topicFacilities and Workplace ManagementFrench-language works237,207