MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1611349326 · doi:10.7202/044205ar

Repenser la norme, réinventer l’agencéité

2010· article· fr· W1611349326 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jean‐Michel Landry

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPietyPoliticsPolitical actionPhilosophySociologyPolitical scienceReligious studiesLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le premier ouvrage de Saba Mahmood, Politics of Piety..., dont la traduction française est parue aux éditions La Découverte en septembre 2009, se veut un effort de décentrement. En s’intéressant à l’implication des femmes à l’intérieur du mouvement islamique, Saba Mahmood amorce une vaste réflexion sur les concepts qui balisent notre compréhension de l’islam, de l’éthique et du politique. L’objectif? Ébrécher le cadre normatif à travers lequel l’action féministe, la résistance et la liberté sont actuellement envisagées ; et donner un sens réellement anthropologique à la notion d’agencéité (agency).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.027
Scholarly communication0.0120.009
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.390
GPT teacher head0.617
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologie et SociétésSame topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, GenderFrench-language works237,207