Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper explores the parallels and intersections of Bioregionalism with Animism in Cambodia. This research aims to show that Bioregionalism draws heavily on animistic spirituality humanitys oldest spiritual belief system- and lifeways. To support this hypothesis, field interviews were conducted with the Tompuan, Brao, Kreung and Bounon ethnic minority groups of Ratanakiri and Mondulkiri provinces in northeastern Cambodia in January and February 2010. Some questions that were put to informants were: Were you always able to live locally sustainable lives? What role do spirits and wildlife play in peoples lives? What do ancient myths tell us about the environment? How well did local people coexist with the flora and fauna before industrialization arrived? Do indigenous people want to fully join civilized society? This broad study will enable students of Bioregionalism and Ecocriticism to expand their knowledge with insights gleaned from little-studied groups of tribal peoples in Cambodia who lived in a highly sustainable relationship with their ancestral lands until the relatively recent arrival of capitalism and industrialization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".