MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1611952776 · doi:10.1002/047001153x.g303315

Energy transfer–based approaches to study <scp>G</scp> protein–coupled receptor dimerization and activation

2005· other· en· W1611952776 on OpenAlexaff
Ralf Jockers, Michel Bouvier, Stéfano Marullo

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics · 2005
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsG protein-coupled receptorReceptorEnergy transferG proteinComputational biologyEnergy (signal processing)ChemistryComputer scienceBiologyPhysicsBiochemistryChemical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract During the past several years, energy transfer–based techniques have become quite popular to study G protein–coupled receptors and the dynamic processes that follow their activation. This review will highlight a number of important biological questions in the field of GPCR biology that have been addressed using these approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Proteomics and BioinformaticsSame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207