MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1612140147 · doi:10.1063/1.1645155

Neutron scattering study of the layered Ising magnet CsDy(MoO4)2

2004· article· en· W1612140147 on OpenAlexaff
E. N. Khatsko, A. Zheludev, J. M. Tranquada, Wim T. Klooster, A. M. Knigavko, Rishi Srivastava

Bibliographic record

VenueLow Temperature Physics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsing modelCondensed matter physicsNeutron scatteringNeutron diffractionExponentCritical exponentAntiferromagnetismPhysicsQuasielastic neutron scatteringScatteringPhase (matter)Materials scienceSmall-angle neutron scatteringDiffractionPhase transitionOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The quasi-two-dimensional antiferromagnet CsDy(MoO4)2 is studied by neutron diffraction and quasielastic neutron scattering. The crystal structure of two low-temperature phases (below 120 K and below 40 K) is determined. An approximate structure of the magnetically ordered phase (TN=1.36 K) is proposed. In the ordered state the order-parameter critical exponent β=0.17(0.01), the in-plane correlation length exponent ν=0.94(0.07), and the staggered susceptibility critical index γ=1.01(0.04) were determined. Comparing these results to the exact solution for a 2D Ising magnet, we conclude that, although 2D behavior is apparent in CsDy(MoO4)2, there are deviations from the simple 2D Ising model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLow Temperature PhysicsSame topicTheoretical and Computational PhysicsFrench-language works237,207