Low energy behavior of the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:math>reaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three related features of the astrophysical S-factor, ${S}_{17},$ for low energies are an upturn as the energy of the proton goes to zero, a pole at the proton separation energy, and a long-ranged radial integral peaking at approximately 40 fm. These features, particularly the last, mean ${S}_{17}$ at threshold is largely determined by the asymptotic normalization of the proton bound-state wave function. In this paper we identify the pole contribution to the S-factor without any explicit consideration of the asymptotic behavior of the bound-state wave function. This allows us to calculate ${S}_{17}$ in terms of purely short-range integrals involving the two-body potential. Much of the discussion is relevant to other radiative capture processes with weakly bound final states.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.806 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".