MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1613764790 · doi:10.1063/1.3183420

Microdomain Phases in Magnetic Multilayers

2009· article· en· W1613764790 on OpenAlexaff
J. P. Whitehead, J. I. Mercer, A. B. MacIsaac, Mohit Singh, R. H. Lipson

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic properties of thin films
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsLipid microdomainMagnetizationMagnetic anisotropyMaterials scienceSpin (aerodynamics)AnisotropySubstrate (aquarium)Thin filmPhysicsNanotechnologyMagnetic fieldChemistryOpticsGeologyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The magnetic properties of ultra‐thin magnetic films can be fine tuned to a remarkable degree by varying the number and composition of the individual layers and the substrate. Of particular interest is the ability to vary the effective magnetic anisotropy by changing the thickness of the film. This allows experimentalists to study in some considerable detail the nature of the magnetization close to the spin reorientation transition. In this paper we review some preliminary results from a theoretical analysis and simulation studies that describe some of the key properties of microdomain phases observed near the spin reorientation transition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicMagnetic properties of thin filmsFrench-language works237,207