MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1614212415 · doi:10.22230/src.2010v1n1a20

OJS as a Tool for Information Technology Integration and Cultural Change: A Case Study in Colombia

2010· article· en· W1614212415 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wilson López‐López, Luis Manuel Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarly and Research Communication · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology Research and Bibliometrics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFront (military)Process (computing)SociologyWorld Wide WebComputer sciencePolitical scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes the implementation of an OJS-based editorial process for a leading Colombian Psychology Journal, Universitas Psychologica, and its integration with a custom-made front-end. It also describes the attempt of making a cultural change in the submission, reviewing and editing processes, within the open access tradition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.190
GPT teacher head0.516
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarly and Research CommunicationSame topicPsychology Research and BibliometricsFrench-language works237,207