MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1615597801

Education and Information Technology 2013: A Selection of AACE Award Papers

2012· book· en· W1615597801 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Theo Bastiaens, Gary Marks

Bibliographic record

VenueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 2012
Typebook
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHigher Education and Teaching Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMonash UniversityU.S. Department of EducationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNOMINATELibrary scienceCertificateSelection (genetic algorithm)Information technologyEngineeringPolitical scienceManagementOperations researchSociologyComputer scienceLawArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This AACE book groups the award winning papers into four parts.These four parts provide a timely overview and record of topics that are of primary interest in educational technology this year.We hope that the reader enjoys this selection as much as we enjoyed working with these cutting-edge scholars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.015
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0130.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0740.073

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)Same topicHigher Education and Teaching MethodsFrench-language works237,207