Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les dangers du sport et de l’éducation physique. L’expérience de la Première Guerre mondiale se traduisit chez les Français notamment par leur souci d’étudier la puissance militaire allemande durant les années 1920. Après la guerre, le « potentiel de guerre » d’un pays incluait des facteurs aussi importants mais difficiles à évaluer que l’unité et la cohésion nationales. Dans ce nouveau contexte, les sports organisés furent considérés comme un indicateur supplémentaire des intentions militaires et du potentiel de guerre d’un pays. Le Deuxième Bureau français a commencé à prendre en compte les efforts de l’Allemagne visant à promouvoir les sports et l’éducation physique dans son analyse du revanchisme allemand et de son potentiel militaire. Les résultats de leur investigation s’avérèrent d’autant plus inquiétants que la comparaison avec la situation en France leur était défavorable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".