MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1615757657

Canadian Surveillance of Space Concept Demonstrator: Photometric Variability of Molniya-Class Objects

2006· article· en· W1615757657 on OpenAlex
Bryce Bennett, Tom Racey, Robert Scott, B. Wallace

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venueamos · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Satellite Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStreakLight curveSidereal timeSatellitePhotometry (optics)EphemerisRemote sensingComputer scienceGeodesyGeologyMathematicsPhysicsOpticsComputer visionAstronomyStars
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the results of an analysis of the time dependence of relative visible magnitudes (“light curves”) of Molniya resident space objects (RSOs). The CCD image data were obtained in sidereal-stare mode, where the satellite is allowed to streak through a ‘stationary’ star field. Various streak extraction algorithms were coded, enabling generation and subsequent analysis of the along-track light-curves of RSOs. The algorithms were tested on virtual data, and then used to examine Molniya-class objects whose light-curves exhibit variability over the image exposure durations. Fourier analysis and other time-series comparisons were performed on archived observations made over periods ranging from a single night to more than a year. The oscillation periods appear stable over periods of up to 18 months; current data will be presented to illustrate the stability of these light curves over the past 6 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.893

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it