MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W161583631 · doi:10.2741/214

P2 receptor expression, signaling and function in osteoclasts

2011· review· en· W161583631 on OpenAlex
P. Reyes Juan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Bioscience-Scholar · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdenosine and Purinergic Signaling
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsOsteoclastBone resorptionCell biologyMultinucleateReceptorChemistryBone remodelingBone cellResorptionSignal transductionStimulationEndocrinologyBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Skeletal development and bone remodeling depend on the coordinated activity of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, which are responsible for bone formation and resorption, respectively. Mature osteoclasts result from the fusion of precursor cells, and they are large, multinucleated, highly specialized cells. Cellular release of ATP and UTP occurs in response to a variety of stimuli including mechanical stimulation, which occurs in the bone environment. ATP and UTP or their metabolites can then act on P2 receptors in the plasma membrane to induce various responses in bone cells. The influence of these receptors on osteoclast physiology and bone physiology in general is beginning to be understood, but much work is still required. This review focuses on P2 receptors in osteoclasts, their expression, signaling and function in the regulation of osteoclast formation, resorptive activity and survival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it