New information on the rare horned dinosaur<i>Arrhinoceratops brachyops</i>(Ornithischia: Ceratopsidae) from the Upper Cretaceous of Alberta, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Arrhinoceratops brachyops is a poorly understood chasmosaurine ceratopsid from the Upper Cretaceous Horseshoe Canyon Formation of Alberta, previously described on the basis of only a single skull. Here, we report on a second specimen attributable to this species, including a relatively complete skull, syncervical, and partial left forelimb. This second specimen clarifies aspects of morphology not visible in the holotype, and also elucidates variation in A. brachyops. The species is distinguished by a square-shaped triangular process of the premaxilla, a steeply inclined triturating surface of the predentary, and a triangular nasal horncore in horizontal section. The dentary is also distinctive in bearing a bony lateral ridge similar to that of Anchiceratops ornatus, but more strongly developed. Phylogenetic analysis cannot resolve the relationships of Arrhinoceratops beyond the level of Chasmosaurinae, owing to both missing data and conflicting characters. However, we do find some support for a deep split within Chasmosaurinae, contrary to conventional topologies. We also report on other fragmentary specimens plausibly attributable to A. brachyops that suggest a minimum age range of approximately 750 ka for this species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".