Tectonic evolution of the active Hikurangi subduction margin, New Zealand, since the Oligocene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deformation across the active Hikurangi subduction margin, New Zealand, including shortening, extension, vertical‐axis rotations, and strike‐slip faulting in the upper plate, has been estimated for the last ∼24 Myr using margin‐normal seismic reflection lines and cross sections, strike‐slip fault displacements, paleomagnetic declinations, bending of Mesozoic terranes, and seafloor spreading information. Post‐Oligocene shortening in the upper plate increased southward, reaching a maximum rate of 3–8 mm/year in the southern North Island. Upper plate shortening is a small proportion of the rate of plate convergence, most of which (>80%) accrued on the subduction thrust. The uniformity of these shortening rates is consistent with the near‐constant rate of displacement transfer (averaged over ≥5 Myr) from the subduction thrust into the upper plate. In contrast, the rates of clockwise vertical‐axis rotations of the eastern Hikurangi Margin were temporally variable, with ∼3°/Myr since 10 Ma and ∼0°–1°/Myr prior to 10 Ma. Post 10 Ma, the rates of rotation decreased westward from the subduction thrust, which resulted in the bending of the North Island about an axis at the southern termination of subduction. With rotation of the margin and southward migration of the Pacific Plate Euler poles, the component of the margin‐parallel relative plate motion increased to the present. Plate convergence dominated the Hikurangi Margin before ca. 15 Ma, with the rate of margin‐parallel motion increasing markedly since 10 Ma. Vertical‐axis rotations could accommodate all margin‐parallel motion before 1–2 Ma, eliminating the requirement for large strike‐slip displacements (for example, >50 km) in the upper plate since the Oligocene.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".