MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1616830270 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2015.7282186

Runtime slack-deficit detection for a low-voltage DCT circuit

2015· article· en· W1616830270 on OpenAlexaff
Yaoqiang Li, Pierce Chuang, Andrew Kennings, Manoj Sachdev

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDiscrete cosine transformOverhead (engineering)VoltageDynamic voltage scalingField-programmable gate arrayEnergy (signal processing)Electronic circuitProcess (computing)Frequency scalingComputer hardwareElectronic engineeringReal-time computingEmbedded systemElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a deployment strategy for Error (slackdeficit) Detection Sequential (EDS) circuits to monitor non-critical paths of application systems at the clock falling edges, requiring neither buffer insertions nor extra clocks. The proposed strategy is applied to an FPGA-based Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) unit together with EDS and Dynamic Voltage Scaling (DVS) circuits as a proof of concept. It is able to speculatively and accurately detect slack-deficits due to dynamic process, voltage and temperature (PVT) variations and correspondingly adjust the supply voltage. When processing realistic input data and operating at the same frequency as a highly-optimized baseline DCT implementation, our design produces equivalent outputs and incurs a 0.3% logic element overhead and 3.5% maximum frequency degradation, but saves up to 16.5% energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207