MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1617115379 · doi:10.3917/rfap.153.0103

Le dernier maillon dans la chaîne des inégalités ? Les particularités du profil des élèves de l’ÉNA

2015· article· fr· W1617115379 on OpenAlexaff
Fabrice Larat

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue française d administration publique · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsÉcole Nationale d'Administration Publique
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Les concours d’accès à l’École nationale d’administration, caractérisés par un haut degré de sélectivité, sont destinés à assurer un recrutement méritocratique de la haute fonction publique. Pourtant le profil des admis présente aujourd’hui comme hier certaines particularités qui reflètent, au moins en partie, l’existence d’inégales chances d’accès. Cela étant, une analyse contextualisée des données récentes montre que ces inégalités ne sont pas propres à l’ÉNA. Elles s’insèrent dans une succession de paliers de sélection tout au long du parcours scolaire et des études supérieures. Les concours d’accès à l’ÉNA ainsi que le classement de sortie n’en représentent que l’étape ultime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue française d administration publiqueSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207